Sunday, March 20, 2011

Critical Annotated Webliograhy

Topic 2: “The machine/organism relationships are obsolete, unnecessary” writes Haraway. In what ways have our relations to machines been theorized?


1.
Nordqvist ,Christian. “Artificial Limbs Attached Directly To Human Skeleton.” Medical News Today 03 Jul 2006 - 13:00 PST.16Marr2011.


The UK scientists at University College London have developed a new technology called Intraosseous Transcutaneous Amputation Prosthesis (ITAP) that enables artificial limbs directly attached to human skeleton; this new technology allows the artificial limbs breach the skin without the risk of infection. It helps and strengthens the bionic limbs which are controlled by the nervous system. The differences between on this new technology and the used artificial limbs is that the used artificial limbs is fixed to an amputee’s stump which may cause the infection easier and ITAP is letting a metal implant (a titanium rod) passes through the skin into the bone and directly attached with the artificial limbs, as the rob is meshed around by skin tissues, the risk of infection can be avoided. Scientist faced lo of difficulties especially attaching live tissue directly to metal without skin infection, they also have looked at the deer’s’ antlers to get idea.
This new technology facilitates the bionic limbs. As the artificial limbs can directly connected with human skin and body, and the skin and dermal tissues will attach to a metal, the boundary between human and machine in terms of the appearance become blurred. Especially scientist analysis the deer’s antlers to get ideas on how tissues and skin can connect with antlers, the machines and human or animal are more complicated to separate.

2.
N/A. “Smartphone Technology Improves Prosthetic Limbs.” Alpha Galileo. 13 December 2010.16Mar2011


This journal is reprinted (with editorial adaptations by ScienceDaily staff) from materials provided by The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). The researchers at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) had tried to improve the sense of the orientation of the artificial limb by integrated the “accelerometer” which used in smartphone technology. The accelerometers act as a tool for detecting the changes in gravity or velocity in order to enable the artificial limb easier to operate by determines its orientation.
When amputees use this technology, they can move their prosthesis easier and increase the accuracy of the orientation of their prosthesis. The journal impresses me that prostheses have been already considered in our body part and the scientists are working hard on improving the functions of it. As far as I know the amputees need training to operate their prosthesis, it sounds to me like people go to gym room to train their muscle in order to make the muscle more strong and the beautify their body figure, and the training of the prosthesis is making it more sensitive to the signal from our nerve system in order to make it act more accurate and smooth. The whole things of the prosthesis are like they are alive and they need treatments and trainings like human muscle.



3.
Yoseph, Bar-Cohen. “Bionic Humans Using EAP as Artificial Muscles Reality and Challenges.” ARS. Volume 1, Number 3, September 2004. 16Mar2011.


The journal has mentioned the development of electroactive polymers (EAP) and pointing out that the development of EAP may help on developing artificial muscles as its special feature. The author also examine the further development of EAP
As EAP is very similar to biological muscles like its resiliency, quite in operation, damage tolerance, able on stretching, contacting and bending, it makes EAP suitable for making mechanical devices and robots which have no traditional components. EAP may potentially be able to use on making artificial organ for human.
In this journal, author have also expressed his view on how robot bring benefit to us or how robot help human to explore the world like we use robot in the space to explore other planet. In my point of view, EAP was used to make the robot more human like, for example to express their emotion, or move more smoothly due to EAP ‘sspecial feature. But now, it can be used to make artificial organs for human beings. The things that firstly intend to invent for machine now come up may use in human. It make me wonder if the things were suppose to use in machine now can be use in human, is the machine helping human or human helping the machine? If we have never developed EAP, will human lose the chance on analysis the possibility of artificial organs?






4.
Timothy E. Quill, M.D. “Terri Schiavo — A Tragedy Compounded.” The New England Journal of Medicine. Massachusetts Medical Society. 21April2005. 16Mar2011. P:16330-1633.


This article is talking about a couple Mr. Michael Schiavo and his wife Mrs. Terri Schiavo; Mrs. Schiavo was diagnosed of a persistent vegetative state and being sustained by artificial hydration and nutrition through a deeding tube for 15 years. The neurologic examination shows that she had wakefulness alternating with sleep, reflexive responses to light and noise etc. but these actions have no signs of emotion, therefore, the neurologists and radiologist determine that Mrs. Schiavo is in a persistent vegetative state. Therefore, Mr. Schiavo wants to end his wife’s live since it seems painful and meaningful to his wife, but Terri’s parents wants their daughter keep on living through a machine, the conflict end up put into the Court.
As a person in a persistent vegetative stat which means that he or she is live by a machine. Without the machine, he or she will die, so is a person in a persistent vegetative stat equal to a cyborg? Can we say that that person is really “alive”? I would describe that a person in a persistent vegetative state is ran by mechanical power like a robot; yet, he or she may eat human food like water and liquid diet, but they cannot live without electricity. Once the machines which keep them alive were turned off by someone, they will die.



5.
Mohammad Aghighi. “Dialysis in Iran.” Management Center for Transplantation and Special Diseases. Iranian Journal of Kidney Diseases, Jan2008. 16Mar2011. p:11-15.



This is an article about the kidney disease in Iran, the Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have become a problem in Iran. People have kidney will there are different patient will receive different kinds of renal replacement therapies (RRTs). There are three different therapies, the first one is called hemodialysis (HD), second is peritoneal dialysis (PD) and ESPD patient have to undergo kidney transplantation. The article has briefly talked about the clinic centers in Iran and how they operate also the government’s participation in managing the centers.
The article has also mentioned that the patients mostly will receive the dialysis therapy twice or three times a week. Kidney is an organ that controls the blood pressure, filter our blood in order to help us get away the waste and control the water balance inside our body, a very important organ to human. Link it will our topic cyborg, a person need the dialysis machine to maintain their life, can we say that he or she is a cyborg? If you are a HD patient, you may have to go to the clinic three times a week, sitting next to a machine, wait for about 4 hours to let the machine filter your blood. The kidney disease patient may not connect to any machine like those artificial limb or prosthesis, but they need a machine to survive.




By Chan Vhing Yi, Valerie (10349849)

Critical Annotated Webliography Guiding Question 4

HENRY CHAU'S (KU)CRITICAL ANNOTATED WEBLIOGRAPHY

Q4. Is a cyborg queer? Discuss critical thinking on the intersections between sexuality and technology. 




By Cayden Mak


        For the idea of cyborg, it goes beyond the dualities. Those dualities are constructed by power relation. It helps us to classify the things such as male and female. We are required to act as the society hoping for. When we are born, we cannot choose our sex, our parents help us. What is the situation of intersex people and transgender people in cyborg? In Cayden Mak’s article, it is related to the transgender people. It states that transgender identities are excluded from Haraway’s cyborg theory because of the perfect examples of cyborg praxis are transgender identities. Also, the society separates the human into two sexes only, male and female. The transgender people cannot have their own identities. They need to classify into male or female. In the article, the DMV officials argued on the sex of writer’s driver license. It can reflect the sex is very important for our daily lives. However, what is the main function for the sex? No one tells us bout that! For the technology, the writer thinks that the technology is oppressor to transgender and it is intentional use of technology to change their being-in-the-world. For the writer, the cyborg is helping people to be themselves.


By Tania Kupczak


From this article, it stated the technological development contributes a lot for the queer family. The queer families can have babies. Sex is not only for the reproductive function. The present technology can lead to new form of family, the queer family. The gay family can find surrogate mother. The lesbian family also can find the male for donating sperm. The technology development can support the queer family for their needs. The queer families are not limited by the body function for reproduction. The technology can help them to have babies which have blood relation. In here, the writer states that there are no limitations on the family role model for the children of the queer family. The family construction and the parent roles have been changed. The queer family can have two male or two female. It is the new form of the family structure. The construction of a family no longer is formed by a male and a female. In fact, the homosexual couples can classify the gender role. It still can provide the role model to their children by their gender behavior. It is breaking the tradition of the function of reproduction, the family construction and social norms.


By Nina Lykke


        From this article, the main idea is ‘Does the the cyborg-world of desexualized, scientific reproduction not overtake the anti-biologist arguments?’ The writer use cyborg and queer as the examples because these two are selected from the wealth of feminist theorist. These two concepts are showing the deconstruction of biological determinism. They are played a prominent role in feminist theory. For the writer’s point of view, the sex and sexuality are socio-cultural and historical constructions. The technology can satisfy the queer desires for having a child. Both the queer and the cyborg are trying to deconstruct the biological determinism. They are trying to break though the cultural imaginary process. By the way, in the writer’s article, it also focuses on the relationship between feminist figuration and cyborg and queer. The new reproductive technology is changing the role of female. For the society norm, the function of female is reproduction. There are a new power relation occur in the female status. The technology can help the infertility couple can have baby by the technology development. Are the female only for reproduction?


By Esperanza Miyake


        In this article, it is mainly focusing on three parts. The first one is “conceptualization of sexuality which sees sexual power embodied in different levels of social life, expressed discursively and enforced through boundaries and binary divides”. The second part is “problematizes sexual and gender categories and identities in general”. The third part is “rejection of civil rights strategies in favor of a politics of carnival, transgression, and parody which leads to deconstruction, decentering, revisionist readings, and anti-assimilations politics” (Miyake, 2004). For the first part, it is mainly related to the power relation of the body. The technology is referring to the cyberspace. It can help us for constructing other identities which we hope for. For the second part, it is talking about the gender role become unclear, a world without gender. The cyberspace helps us for opening an online or offline queer cyborgs recreation. It is true that the cyberspace cannot provide any evidences on proofing the real identities of the users. Everyone can construct another identity which can be totally different in their real lives. For the third part, it is about the three boundaries breaking down. The private and public life become blurred by the technology. The identities can not reflect the whole person. It just show you what the person hope you can access.


By Kyle Munkittrick


        For this article, it gives us a brief introduction of Donna Haraway’s cyborg theory. It states the most important idea of the theory: breakthrough the three boundaries. The writer thinks that the idea of cyborg is rebellion embodied in a single techno-organic subject. Then, it gives the readers the features of the cyberfeminism. It has the interaction of gender role and mutual construction in society. It talks about what is normal and how the time and space change the definition of normal. It uses the example of homosexual. At the past, the society cannot accept homosexual. Nowadays, it is acceptable and become a sexuality which has a large number of people. It is the deconstruction of the function cyborg. It can change the social norms. After, it goes to the relationship between political change and the transhuminanist model. It is based on the effect of the cyberfeminist model. It uses the reproductive technology as the example. In these technology, the female has no said and being ignored. The transhuminists support many women issues and liberal the female from the ignorance. It changes the political structure of female. They start to express themselves. For the final section, it states the transgender and intersexual group in the society. The technology contributes on a person to change his or her biological sex. It can lead a chain of question like a person birth certificate is male but with a female’s driving license. Furthermore, it involves the duty and the right of that transgender person in the society. The transgender and intersexual idea and the technology go too fast compare with the society and politics development. The change is still keep occurring. The cyborg theory can bring a forward step to our society and the mindset of people.
       
Works Cited
Kupczak, Tania. "So You Wanna Be a Cyborg Mommy? Queer Identity and New Reproductive Technologies." Domain Errors!: Cyberfeminist Practices. By Maria Fernandez, Faith Wilding, and Michelle M. Wright. New York: Autonomedia, 2002. 179-86. Web. 14 Mar. 2011. <http://www.refugia.net/domainerrors/DE2g_queer.pdf>.
Munkittrick, Kyle. "On the Importance of Being a Cyborg Feminist." H Magazine | Covering Technological, Scientific, and Cultural Trends That Are Changing–and Will Change–human Beings in Fundamental Ways. 21 June 2009. Web. 14 Mar. 2011. <http://hplusmagazine.com/2009/07/21/importance-being-cyborg-feminist/>.
Lykke, Nina. "ARE CYBORGS QUEER? Biological Determinism and Feminist Theory in the Age of New Reproductive Technologies and Reprogenetics." Web. 12 Mar. 2011. <http://www.women.it/quarta/workshops/epistemological4/ninalykke.htm>.
Mak, Cayden. "Cyborg Theory, Cyborg Practice » The Outlet." Electric Literature  Home . 11 May 2010. Web. 15 Mar. 2011. <http://electricliterature.com/blog/2010/05/11/cyborg-theory-cyborg-practice/>.
Miyake, Esperanza. "My, Is That Cyborg a Little Bit Queer?" Journal of International Women's Studies 5.2 (2004): 53-61. Web. 14 Mar. 2011. <http://www.bridgew.edu/soas/jiws/Mar04/Miyake.pdf>.

BY HENRY CHAU

Critical Annotated Webliography Guiding Question 2

Q2: The machine/organism relationships are obsolete, unnecessary ‘writes Haraway. In what ways have our relations to machines been theorized?

1. Takayuki, Kanda (2004) “Human Computer Interaction”
http://www.irc.atr.jp/~kanda/pdf/kanda-interactive-robots-as-social-partner.pdf
(accessed day 3rd March, 2011)

In this research, it shows that the robots have the potential to interact with human in daily life and children can learn English when they interact with robot. Although robot can improve human’s daily life and become human partner, it has many problems to improve and to be more progressed. For instance, the researcher indicates that children can through interaction with robot to learn English.
In my opinion, it can attract children’s interest of learning English when they play with robot, but it is not long term for children to learn knowledge. It is because its communication skill is still flawed (e.g. robot answer human slowly) and robots have not enough phrases to communicate with people, it can only increase children’s interested in English initially and their English level may not be progressed. In fact, robot’s expression is not as natural as human and its expression is limited, so children may feel boring when they face to the robot long time. If researchers want to through interaction with robot to improve children’s English level, they need to increase more English phrases or words into robot and improve robot’s expression to be more natural. In fact, I think robot is gimmick to attract children learning English, if we want to learn knowledge; we need to learn from teacher, not the robot.



2. Dr Fong, Kevin (2011) “The Man with a Plastic Heart”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12422348
(accessed day 28 th February, 2011)

In this article, it points out that the patients of heart disease can have new life and they can reduce their waiting time for donator, if they transplant the artificial heart into their body and replace their natural heart.
In my opinion, the technology is not only convenient for us to develop our society, it also more related with our daily life nowadays and the relationship of boundary between human and machine become blurring. It is because they need to carry a rucksack to charge artificial heart in their every time, and they cannot without electricity and seem robot, it appears new relation between human and machine. Although patient can improve their life, they need to rely on machine to live all the time and it also has risk when they transplant plastic heart. In fact, they need to carry a rucksack to charge artificial heart in their every time and there is some limitation for artificial heart. For instance, they cannot do some exercise, running or swimming. Compare with general people, patient’s appearance and action is same as normal human but their inside heart is not natural and it is constructed by technology, artificial heart. Therefore, the machines control our life, no longer only people control the machine and human also start to be passive in the relationship between human and technology.






3. Cynthia Breazeal “Affective Interaction between Humans and Robots”
http://www.isrl.illinois.edu/~amag/langev/localcopy/pdf/breazeal01affectiveInteraction.pdf
(accessed day 5 th March, 2011)

In this research, it points out that there is close relationship between human and robot in our daily life, such as there is robot pets for children and robotic nursemaids for elderly. Moreover, human can through different tone of voice and signal to order robot and it has ability to change in emotional state and express this state to human. Even robot is machine and its body is not same as human, it has own thinking and emotion to express suitable feedback to human. Therefore, robot not only gives feedback or follows the order to human; it also let the relationship close between human and robot when it communicates with human and it can seem close friend.
Although the researcher indicates that there are both beneficial for human and robot when they interact with others, it still has some problem between human and robot. For instance, elder require some special training to interact with robot if they have robotic nursemaid and interact with robot. It is because their communication skill and ability of adaption is slower than youth; they need to have time to adapt interaction with robot. We cannot only focus on youth and ignore elder or children’s desire when they interact with robot, so researchers also need to invent or improve robot for them. Moreover, the interaction of training can let human more understand or order robot and let their relation is more closed with robot, so the interaction of training is required.




4. Alex Juarez, Christoph, Bartneck and Lou, Feijs (2009) “Journal of Virtual Worlds Research”
http://alexandria.tue.nl/openaccess/Metis234623.pdf
(accessed day 7 th March, 2011)

The writers indicate that the technology development progress continuously, it not only helps human in labor and hazardous work, appearance of robot and internet also let the relationship between human and machine to be close. Furthermore, writers also emphasize that human through visual world (internet) to build up their community and it also lead the real and visual world mergence.
In nowadays, I think human is more and more rely on visual world or machine (e.g. mobile platform) in daily life and it also become a part of our daily life. It is because the machine and technology not only let our society to be developed, it is also convenient for human to connect others and build up communities. Therefore, it also becomes more important in our daily life. Although it lets our society to become convenient, it also brings some problem in the real world. For instance, youth usually put their photos of daily life into visual world and share with their group mates in visual world, so they combine their real life and visual world together and lead boundary with real and visual world to be blur. For example, we may think these photos are true, when we through internet to see strangers’ photos and we don’t know the reality of it. Thus, we can only through photos to know stranger when we use internet to communicate with other. Furthermore, we enjoy posting our daily life into internet and more and more people can share it to their friends, so internet break down our privacy and it is difficult for us to protect private information.


5. Flaspöler, Eva and Angelika, Hauke (The Human Machine Interface as an Emerging Risk)
http://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/literature_reviews/HMI_emerging_risk
(accessed day 9th March, 2011)

In the research, the writers point out that the development of machine is more developed in nowadays and human also more and more depend on new machine, e.g. computer, so it can save working time and increase the quality of work. Although computer brings many benefits to human, it also brings some problem to us. For instance, it can give rise to occupational diseases, such as stress or musculoskeletal disorders, as well as to occupational accidents.
In my opinion, computer becomes a part of our daily life and brings some problem to us in the same time. Although we can use computer to connect internet to get information and communicate with others to expand relationship of friends, it leads less time face to face communicate with parents when we use computer. Because we spend long time in machine (e.g. computer) and lack face to face communication with others, it leads poor communication skill now and more depend on computer in our daily life. For instance, we rely on software system (spelling) when we do homework in Microsoft Word, and it can correct our spelling if we make the grammar mistake, so it let us rely on computer. In fact, the relationship between human and machine is becoming close continuously and depend on it. For example, we may feel disconnected with the world or others and lack sense of security, if we have not computer to connect internet or mobile phone. Therefore, we cannot lack of machine and more depend on it nowadays.


By Kitty Tang

Critical Annotated Webliography

Guiding question: Blogging is a practice that is mundane and yet radical in its potential to transform individual and collective agency and activism. Discuss.


1) Chin-Lung, Hsu, and Lin Judy Chuan-Chuan. "Acceptance of Blog Usage: The Roles of Technology Acceptance,." ELSEVIER. Information & Management, 17 Nov. 2007. Web. 15 Mar. 2011.

The paper pointed out that blogging becomes a key online culture. Also, survey shown that blog readers and creators are young.
The authors believe that blog provides a way for people to publish material of any topic he or she wants to discuss in their blog. Therefore, blog is such a new place to express and exchange information and thoughts.
Hot issues in society are popular topics towards a certain time period. So, hot issues can attract great amount of readers and cause great influence on society.
Besides, famous blog can influence readers' attitude too. These blogs can instill an attitude as the blogger develops a perception towards their readers group. It makes blogging becomes a new community. We cannot ignore the power of blog. It provides a platform for people to discuss topics which may sensitive. Also, it can influence one's behavior or thoughts of some issues. Furthermore, some factors like the reputation and altruism of the blog will positively affect users' attitudes toward participating in a blog.


2) Ramona, Sidlo. "Injoy Design » Blogging Agency." Injoy Design » Putting Joy in Design! Web. 16 Mar. 2011. .

Today, blogging has great influence in our daily lives. There are different kinds of blog today in relation to different kinds of interest. Through these kinds of blog, they are able to attract a certain kind of viewers and gather great amount of supporters. It can enlarge their community circle too.
According to Kate, she said that “Most writers are not getting published in magazines or literary journals, for some more unconventional voices, for people that don't have connections, blogs can be an entryway into the game.” From what she said, we can see that blogging is such a platform to express ones unconventional voices. In the past, magazines and journals is an ideal platform for people to express their views. Also, to voice up through magazines and journals seems more powerful since there is limitation to express opinions in magazines. Not everyone can participate through magazines and journals but editors and journalists can. Nowadays, blogging provides a place for public to express their thoughts. Also, it pointed out that no matter who you are, you can create a blog account. Your connections would not affect you to enter the world of blogging as everyone has their rights to do it. So, blogging does help ones' agency.



3) Jennifer, Mattern. "Popularity vs Influence in Blogging and Social Media: What’s the Difference?" Social Implications — Exploring the Impact of Social Media. 13 Apr. 2010. Web. 16 Mar. 2011. .

The article did point out that many people misunderstand the idea of “popularity” and “influence” in blogging. Undoubtedly, people would think that bloggers with higher ranking can cause greatest influence towards their readers. It is because “popularity” is related to many people like you, a lot of comments and many visitors. However, the article clarifies that the differences between popularity and influence.
From the figures of the influence landscape, we can see that “influence” means the impact on how we think, behave and spend. Also, driving forces, networks and influencer are all affecting us.
On the other hand, the example can explain the differences between popularity and influence of a blog. A traffic blog may attract large amount of readers but it may not sufficient to influence others' actual action because of their nature. Moreover, the popularity can be due to the passerby. People only visit the blog and move on. When the blog asks their readers to do something, it is not convincing at all. Therefore, numbers is not reliable.

Popularity always gives people a wrong message that they are famous, so they are influential to attract people enter their blog. Blogging transform individual and collective agency. It trains their critical thinking of the resource too. However, readers are smart nowadays. They can distinguish which is reliable and which is not.



4) "How Do You Measure Blog Influence?" Friedbeef's Tech. Web. 16 Mar. 2011. .


The “influence ripples” show us that bloggers with higher ranking have larger ripples effect. On the other hand, bloggers with lower ranking are able to influence others too as they have smaller ripples. Also, there are many bloggers with lower ranking around us. When those small ripples group together, they are even more than bigger ripples. It has its potential to influence the society. It is difficult to measure the influence of a blog as it is not equate to the blog popularity. So, no one is absolutely small in the blogging world. Today, everyone is an influencer. When everyone becomes influencer, it's difficult to differentiate who is affecting the others and their agency.
In addition, blog is a reachable at anytime and anywhere, instead of magazines. Readers have more choices on choosing their suitable and ideal platform. More, bloggers can interact with their readers and they can exchange their same thoughts.

Again, the writer believes that blogging can influence people in different ways. The most influential blogs can even affect readers purchase decisions, voters and governmental policies. Nowadays, blogging can influence customers' purchase decisions. It can affect people to chose which products to buy and not to buy based on bloggers . Therefore, it has certain power to affect collective agency.



5) Hedi, Smith. "Why Blogging Is So Mainstream in Today's Society?" Business Articles - EzineMark - Free Content Article Directory. 29 Mar. 2010. Web. 16 Mar. 2011. .

From creating a blog name, we can see how people act their agency. In cyberspace, we are able to create a nickname that you like.
Blogging is so popular because it's “embracing our rights by the constitution” it reminds us it is our rights to speak and voice up our opinion and thoughts. In our blog, you can speak whatever you want without any consequences. It reflects not only individual and collective agency. Blogging also functioned as self-identification. It has its meaning of the visitor number.
Blogging is so successful because it has changed our way of communication. On one hand, people can feel free to express their opinions and thoughts. On the other hand, people can react and reply to the post. It offers a platform for people to interact. Also, blogging allows people
So, blogging is the easiest way to interact with others and to meet same interest of people.

Last but not least, it reminds us blogging also provides selection to users. They can choose to read the content only without any reply. It is sufficient to reflect ones' reaction.



by Tracy Cheung

Critical Annotated Webliography Guiding Question 2

Guiding Question :‘The Machine/organism relationships are obsolete, unnecessary’ writes Haraway. In what ways have our relations to machines been theorised?

1. Warwick, Kevin (2000) “Cyborg 1.0”
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.02/warwick.html (accessed 11 March 2011)


Kevin Warwick outlined his plan to become a part of a machine. Firstly, he implanted a silicon chip into his arm by transmitting and recording his actions and signals through radio waves to computer, in order to create a response from computer. The first experiment was successful; hence, they had planned to conduct another experiment by not only implant silicon chip into his body, but also in his nerve system, which might ultimately place the implants nearer to the brain, in order to receive and record more complex sensory signal. I.e. emotional signs. Which led to a bolder assumption and conclusion that, the boundaries between machine and human were getting blurrier. Eventually we would all become cybernetic organism; contains a combination of natural (human) and artificial components (computer).
Warwick discussed further that, human created machine to increase the capacity of mankind, and there would be possibility that machine can be more intelligent than us in future. Hence, cybernetic is a necessary action for human to receive benefit from machine, by integrating into them.
The article encored the phrase of Haraway, the relations between machine and human were unnecessary. The hybridization of machine and technology has made a blurrier boundary. This article has shown that, there would be more interaction and interface between human and machine as an inevitable trend, as Harway pointed out that, machine was our process, an aspect of human kind’s embodiment (Harway).

2. Hayles, N. Katherine (1999) “How We Became Posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetic, literature, and informatics”
http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/321460.html (accessed 11 March 2011)


Hayles began her analysis by offering example of a human communicating with two other entities from a different room from Alan Turing’s research, whom the human need to identify which one was the another human being, by posing questions to distinguish during conversations. The machine was programed to mislead you by imitating the response of another person. The human could distinguish wrongly due to the programmed responses. From this example, knowledge or information could be bodiless that flow between different physical forms without losing the authenticity. As a result, machine could also be human by having human’s knowledge.
Hayles argued that there were other factors needed to be considered, for instance, free will, free speech, she further elaborated an example a female’s response by a man would not prove that he was a woman, when gender was a social cultural construct. Verbal performance could not be equal with embodied reality.
Instead, it were about our perceptions in this cognitive system, no matter what identification we put on the embodied entities, we were all post humans, as the intervention not came only by the decision we make for distinguishing which one was enacted body or represented body, rather, when the test put human into a cybernetic environment for communicating with machines, we had all became post-human.
This article reinforces Haraway’s quote. Instead of actively turning human into part of machine, as the relationships is self-perpetuated evolving. We had passively become post- human/cyborgs.


3. Turkle, Sherry. 2007 “Simulation Versus Authenticity”
http://web.mit.edu/sturkle/www/pdfsforstwebpage/ST_Simulation%20vs%20Authenticity.pdf (accessed 11 March 2011)


Turkle presented her argument by two examples in her article. She brought her daughter to an exhibition of Charles R. Darwin. He was famous of the evolution theory; that all species of life would descend over time from common ancestry. During the exhibition her daughter commented that the turtle at the entrance of the exhibition should have changed it into a robot turtle for aesthetic purpose and freedom of the “alive turtle.” It was an ironic example when the writer was visiting the Darwin’s exhibition as Darwin’s evolution theory was about the distinction of species.
She argued that the idea of originality was in crisis; younger generation considered that, simulation had the same value as the notion of authenticity.Furthermore, Turkle was engaged in a therapeutic robot research in a nursing home for elderly in 2005. She studied that a “seal-like robot’’ had brought a sense of comfort for the abandoned elderly lady, when it was able to make eye contact, body interaction with human.Even though the therapeutic robot was a relational artifact, it had the ability to echo emotions out from human and made human felt that they were being appreciated and understood.
She criticized that it was not based on the robot’s intelligence or consciousness, rather, fundamentally deceitful interchange. The rise of simulation was challenging human uniqueness, which reinforced evolution theory, that change played a role in species for next generation, when it highly based on the strong survival skills on earth.
Our relations with machine, has lessen the uniqueness of human, especially now we could substitute a computer for human being- animal, children, or friends, for fantasy of reciprocation purpose. Regardless of machine was only a representation of human being.


4.Ivers, Christi. (2007) “(Inter)facing the Other: An analysis of the Role of Cyborg Partiality in Constructing Identity
http://www.drake.edu/artsci/PolSci/ssjrnl/2007/ivers.pdf (accessed 11 March 2011)

Christi began by addressing how machine/human relations had reconstructed our identities. Facial feature was one of the strongest senses of identity in human kind. In a tragic accident that had cost Isabelle Dinoire lost most of her face features, as she was brutally savaged by a dog. She later had a face transplant surgery to reconstruct her face. Her new face was composed of a brain-dead donor. Christi argued that her Dinoire’s new face was no longer wholly her own, instead, it was a hybrid face through the mediation of technology, which became a collective identity.

Unlike Frankenstein’s character, not willing to be considered as the “others”; Dinoire literalized the cyborg identity. Blended herself into the social and scientific structure. The transplant surgery allowed her to reassemble herself by a partial identity.Ivers argued that, identity was not defined by individualism, rather, by the impact of other individuals. Just as Haraway theory of cyborg, “[t]he cyborg is a kind of disassembled and reassembled, postmodern collective and personal self.” (Haraway)
The relations between machine and human are intertwined and becoming inseparable. Cyborg gave human a new chance of identity, a new kind of wholeness formed by parity.


5. Breen, Jennifer. (2007) “Cyborg Gender”
http://www.cyborgdb.org/breen.htm (accessed 11 March 2011)

Breen stated that the person using internet has a cyborg identity, as it was part machine and part human. It allowed her to have multiple identities, she could be a man or woman on the internet, and engaged in social networking with others. McLuhan once stated that, medium was an extension of mankind. We joined in the collective cyberspace; meanwhile, collective cyberspace joined us too. Unlike in the real world, cyberspace allowed people to have control over the identities. As internet allowed people to express their identity in a way they wanted to be shown.

She further elaborated that, choosing gender identity was one of the liberation of internet by offering examples of why individuals chose to switch genders on the internet, i.e. some individuals wanted to express themselves from the cultural patriarchal stereotypes. The ability to choose gendered role on the cyberspace has strengthen the argument from Haraway, that relationship between machine and organism could be obsolete, yet, it created a new space of liberation from gendered identity.


by Chen Yi Chen, Rebecca

Critical Annotated Webliography

Guiding Question 2:
'The machine / organism relationships are obsolete, unnecessary' writes Haraway. In what ways have our relations to machines been theorised?

1. Women and technology in geography: a cyborg manifesto for GIS

The writer claims that women participate and engage in science and technology. The cyborg is blended with computer technology and humans. The relationship which humans share with machines is symbolic. She explains the cyborg theory by using her experience. As a writer, she has become a cyborg. She is connected to the computer and the idea what she generated is mediated when she is sitting down and using computer to write the paper. The cyborg is shorthand for the human / electronic interface. Human activities are connected through technology progressively, involving a rapid increase in number of cyborgs. Consequently, it is very difficult to divide humans and machines. It reconstitutes the power relations between human and machine. It can be known that the lines of power are shifting, to some extent, to incorporate the cyborg. Therefore, the boundaries between human and machine is changing. Besides, it represents women have more opportunities to involve in science and technology. This point of view identifies that cyborgs have material qualities. It is a political action for women to construct cyborgs by taking part in technology as technology is a social process. It is a responsibility for us to decide the characteristics of the cyborgs, whether the cyborgs are masculinist or feminist.

Schuurman, Nadine. "Women and Technology in Geography: a Cyborg Manifesto for GIS." The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien 46.3 (2002): 258-65. 12 Mar. 2011. <http://www.sfu.ca/gis/schuurman/cv/pdf/2002cg.pdf>.


2. Cyborgs and Atomic Microscopes

Gualtieri discusses the ethics of creating a hybrid of man and machine which is a cyborg. The word “cyborg” was introduced by Manfred Clynes in 1960, which is shorthand for Cybernetic Organism. The creation of cyborg was proposed as a way to release humans from many of the less attractive tasks of life, such as tending the hearth to achieve a comfortable room temperature. The idea of a cyborg takes cybernetics a step further by making humans a part of a more efficient machine. Since there is hybrid of human and machine, it seems that humans have lost their humanity in the course of the loss of human skin like the cyborg astronaut. It is hard to determine whether the astronaut is human or not. Besides, to some extent, humans have become cyborgs nowadays. People often use different kinds of medical and scientific instruments in daily lives. It confuses the boundary of human and machine. With technological advancement, it becomes more complex to recognize the cyborg in the future. It is possible for human to become a cyborg as it will be ordinary to inject small machines due to the medical use. It seems humans are no longer natural at all.

Gualtieri, Devlin M. "Cyborgs and Atomic Microscopes." Phi Kappa Phi Forum 84.2 (2004). 11 Mar. 2011. <http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa4026/is_200404/ai_n9381412/>.

3. Human/Machine Reconsidered

The author discusses the non-human agency, especially the machine. It is because there are several developments both in the area of interactive computing and in the debate within social studies of science and technology on agency in the last decade. There is a shift of the way that people construct the human / machine boundaries. She observes a renewed interest in the idea of artificial “agents”, “knowbots” and other computational artifacts attributed with a capacity for intelligent, interactive behavior has brought with the rise of the internet. In her previous work, she proposed that the term “interaction” might be best used to describe what continues to happen between a person and one another, rather than extended to encompass relations between people and machines. She argued the latter was better characterized in terms of different forms of mediation and use. In this paper, she re-examine this argument in light of reflections on developments over the past ten years. She suggests that while interesting developments have arisen undoubtedly during that time in terms of relative and renew ideas of human / non-human agency, critical issues of living experience and responsibility within particular culturally and historically constituted moral / political orders remains. She argues the boundaries between humans and machines are not natural but historically and culturally constructed. As being ontology, humans and non-humans can combine without removing cultural and historical differences. When objects are subjectified and subjects are objectified, the human / artifact boundaries seem not to be present.

Suchman, Lucy. "Human/Machine Reconsidered." Cognitive Studies 5.1 (1998): 5-13. 12 Mar. 2011. <http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jcss/5/1/1_5/_pdf>.

4. Looking Forward to Sociable Robots

Glenda examines the work through humanoid social robot projects. There are different points of views about machines. One states that there is a division between nature and culture. The nature should be separated from the society. Other claims that there is a relationship between humans and machines. Since the social robots would behave as realistic and dependable partners, it is easy for them to get into human world. As those social robots are produced to emerge in various kinds of human environments, it would change the society obviously. The ontological division between human and machine no longer exists in society. People are now living in cyborg era because their lives are greatly relied on machines. On the other hand, there is social impact on human-robot interaction. Interacting with human, robots are one of the social actors in the society. This introduces the challenge on the relationship of human and robots. There is ontological blurring between human and robot. When humanoid social robots become more familiar with human’s lifestyle, it seems that they cannot be regarded as simple machines anymore as they have blended with human. Therefore, the boundary between human and machine becomes blurred.

Glenda, Shaw-Garlock. "Looking Forward to Sociable Robots." International Journal of Social Robotics 1.3 (2009): 249-60. 14 May 2009. 13 Mar. 2011. <http://www.springerlink.com/content/570101q4u1589j0t/fulltext.pdf>.

5. The Dada Cyborg: Visions of the New Human in Weimar Berlin

Youngman’s looking at Berlin Dada works through the cyborg reveals that this action understood as destructive in general. It can be seen as a constructive study of new forms of hybrid identity. It is not simply an aesthetic taking apart authoritarian figures and other familiar targets. Biro's analysis of the cyborg successfully allows him to make the claim that avant-garde art did not do away with the contextual meanings of its individual parts. Most of Biro’s examinations of Berlin Dada are made by the concept of the cyborg as a construct of cybernetic theory and concept of the cyborg as an eliminator of boundaries - human-machine, animal-human, physical-non-physical. Biro uses these to help to develop the new image of the cyborg: establishes Dada as a form of political discourse and sets up the cyborg as a creature embodying new modes of perceiving created by the technological impact on human sensory organs. He emphasizes cyborgs with mechanically having greater hearing and vision. He also highlighted that there is a link between creators and consumers of the cyborg. Since humans and machines are interrelated, it is not necessary to differentiate between human and machine.

Youngman, Paul A. "The Dada Cyborg: Visions of the New Human in Weimar Berlin." German Quarterly 83.3 (2010). 1 July 2010. 13 Mar. 2011. <http://www.faqs.org/periodicals/201007/2129933771.html>.

By Annie Cheng

Critical Annotated Webliography

2. ‘The machine/organism relationships are obsolete, unnecessary’ writes Haraway.
In what ways have our relations to machines been theorised?

John Schueller, Malini. “Analogy and (white) feminist theory: Thinking race and the color of the cyborg body” Retrieved on 10th March 2011
<https://filer.case.edu/dav/atv5/Cyborg%20Body.pdf>
Summary
This paper was mainly focus on the relationship between cyborg and the race problem. The writer of this paper tried to explain the subject with using quote of Haraway. At the paper, the writer thought what could be the factors that were composed between cyborg and race were women and the color of their skins. She then sum up with a conclusion that there was no actual relationship between them. In one way that some said cyborg was explaining the boundaries of human and technology, the skin of a cyborg representing the idea of humanness rather than representing a racist. But the writer quote from Haraway words,“race, gender, and capital require a cyborg theory of wholes and parts” (Haraway 1991, 181) This is more like the stand of the writer than explaining they have no relationship.
In my own, the skin is an important element in a theory of cyborg. What make the difference between human and machine was that machine was created by human. Skin gives them an outstanding look to pretend to look like more pro human. Sometimes the color of the skin of the cyborg may represent the status of the function of cyborg.

Davis-Floyd, Robbie. “Cyborg babies: from techno-sex to techno-tots” retrieved on 10th March 2011
<http://www.google.com/books?hl=zh-TW&lr=&id=7GNFSgwG1KgC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1951&dq=cyborg&ots=9bd5ZcL9Ch&sig=ALp7lW42pCe3Fs0GIpn8HbAZWz8#v=onepage&q&f=false>
Summary
This is an introduction part of a published book. While the whole book did not include full of the text all about cyborg, but the front part of the paper did had some research on the cyborg. So, the reason why made the writer to be so interest in this topic was the film production industry of the United State. He found that there are lots of science fiction movies out there such as the Terminator. He then inspired a question that there were tube babies, babies that were formed by an unnatural ways. In this sense, babies will not be just babies anymore, they are the combination of science and human, matched with the theory of cyborg.
Since the babies were born by the artificial method. I agreed that the writer views on cyborg. Now cyborg was not only acquired but also inborn. Which these kind of babies do not have mechanic body or organs, but with changeable DNA and germs. All these are managed by the technologies. So the boundaries between human and machine are being burred. One special feature of the term human is the uniqueness of being the only one. Once babies could be form by choosing germs, the uniqueness seems to be ironic to say they are simply human.

Haraway, Donna. "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century," retrieved on 10th March 2011
<http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/Haraway/CyborgManifesto.html>
Summary
This is a research paper from Donna Haraway which was discussing the theory of cyborg. In the paper, the writer insisted that we, the human were cyborgs. It was us to put imaginary and reality to be combined. We gave cyborgs meanings, guiding their appearances, and forming rules. So, it was irony to try to separate us and the technology. We were making tools for ourselves to living better. The writer also questioned about the construction and deconstruction of the cyborg. This theory is the intimate experience of boundaries.
In our daily lives, we are benefited by the technology. For example, we use machines to make the task done. Such as we drive a car to get far way. In sense, we created the car and while we get on the car. We are one part of this machine to get well work. Without us, there is no meaning and purposes for the car. So, is there a combination of human and machine? Defiantly yes, and this is what we called a form of cyborg.

Warwick, Kevin. “Cyborg morals, cyborg values, cyborg ethics” retrieved on 10th March 2011
<http://archlab.gmu.edu/people/rparasur/Documents/Warwickcyborg.pdf>
Summary
This paper tried to discuss the moral, values and ethics of the cyborg. The writer thought that cyborg had some kind of linking with the human background, it reflect our lives. So, the values, moral and the ethics are reflecting our history, our ways of thinking. That’s mean it was not an absolute to say rather it is wrong or true. It depends on the history of your own. The writer also questioned about nowadays could cyborg can be avoided. Which the technology nowadays was improved a lot, could we “upgrade” to be a cyborg?
This is a funny question that it seemed cyborg could not be avoided in the future. Actually, we are all cyborg for now. Cyborg may not be tight with the sense of embodiment. What we see in science fiction films was just a one form of the cyborg. Cyborg could be explained by the unnatural power or abilities of what human can’t do. Let say the mobile phone. With this, we can communicate with others for a far distance through the network. This is not an inborn ability of our human. It’s the technology turned us to be powerful.

David Bell,Barbara M. Kennedy. “The cybercultures reader” retrieved on 10th March 2011
<http://www.google.com/books?hl=zh-TW&lr=&id=MKtr_svfY1kC&oi=fnd&pg=PA374&dq=cyborg&ots=9erynT5dGE&sig=b8POYuESFK0suqSIYT0g0T6mAQk#v=onepage&q=cyborg&f=false>
Summary
This is an online book which the writer had divided into nine parts, the approaching cyberculture, the popular cyberculture, cybercultures, cyberfeminism, cybersexual, cyberbodies, post cyberbodies, scaling cyberbodies and cybercolnoization. Whilt each frame of the part was writing on different aspect and by different writers. They grouped the idea to from a title, the cyborg. It aimed to found out the ways that the culture of cyborg was being experienced and imaged. The writer thought we had a close relationship with the communicating technology for now, we can easily get information from the internet. The accessible information is the transformation of cyborg.
May be the writer want to focus on the relation between cyborg, human, and technology. In a level extent to the technology that it would not turn human into cyborg, I think internet is a reasonable element to justify whether we are cyborg or not. Internet is a database of information that we could use only one click for tones of information. Now we say information is power, so we are make use of these information to achieve in our daily lives.

Reference

John Schueller, Malini. “Analogy and (white) feminist theory: Thinking race and the color of the cyborg body” Retrieved on 10th March 2011 <https://filer.case.edu/dav/atv5/Cyborg%20Body.pdf>

Davis-Floyd, Robbie. “Cyborg babies: from techno-sex to techno-tots” retrieved on 10th March 2011 <http://www.google.com/books?hl=zh-TW&lr=&id=7GNFSgwG1KgC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1951&dq=cyborg&ots=9bd5ZcL9Ch&sig=ALp7lW42pCe3Fs0GIpn8HbAZWz8#v=onepage&q&f=false>

Haraway, Donna. "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century," retrieved on 10th March 2011 <http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/Haraway/CyborgManifesto.html>

Warwick, Kevin. “Cyborg morals, cyborg values, cyborg ethics” retrieved on 10th March 2011 <http://archlab.gmu.edu/people/rparasur/Documents/Warwickcyborg.pdf>

David Bell,Barbara M. Kennedy. “The cybercultures reader” retrieved on 10th March 2011 <http://www.google.com/books?hl=zh-TW&lr=&id=MKtr_svfY1kC&oi=fnd&pg=PA374&dq=cyborg&ots=9erynT5dGE&sig=b8POYuESFK0suqSIYT0g0T6mAQk#v=onepage&q=cyborg&f=false>


By Zack Wong